08 / Aviation investigations

A flight has many records. They must tell a coherent story.

Independent review of aviation evidence across operational, technical, commercial and human-factor workstreams. Reconstruct the record behind an incident, decision or disputed allegation.

OperationsTechnical recordsDecision chronology
WHO WE SUPPORT

Counsel, operators, owners & authorised parties

WHAT WE EXAMINE

Operational, technical & commercial evidence

WHAT YOU RECEIVE

Integrated aviation evidence review

THE INVESTIGATIVE SCOPE

Bring the records together. Examine the decision in context.

An aviation matter may span flight documentation, maintenance history, cargo handling and commercial arrangements. We coordinate a factual review around the event and the questions that matter to the instruction.

01

Can the event sequence be reconciled?

Align supplied operational logs, dispatch records, communications and other relevant material in a common chronology.

02

Which technical records affect the account?

Identify relevant maintenance, airworthiness and technical documentation for review by appropriately qualified specialists.

03

What information was available to the decision-maker?

Reconstruct the documented information flow, operational responsibilities and decisions at relevant points.

04

Does the commercial record change the context?

Map relevant ownership, leasing, handling, procurement or payment arrangements against the event under review.

THE PURPOSE

One event. A complete view of its available records.

HOW AN INSTRUCTION BEGINS

The BALANCE-7 approach
01 / DEFINE

The question
comes first.

We clarify the material issue, available records, authority and jurisdictions before proposing the work.

02 / EXAMINE

Evidence meets
independent scrutiny.

The agreed workstreams connect sources, test reasoning and identify what remains unresolved.

03 / REPORT

Findings return
to their sources.

Counsel receives a scoped record of the analysis, supporting exhibits and material limitations.

BEFORE YOU INSTRUCT

Clear questions.
Straight answers.

Do you replace an official safety investigation?+

No. This is an independent evidential review. Official investigative, regulatory and safety functions remain with the competent authorities.

Who provides technical opinions?+

Technical questions are matched to appropriately qualified specialists. Their remit, source material and limitations are defined for the engagement.

Can the review cover a commercial aviation dispute?+

A suitable factual instruction can include operational, ownership, leasing or commercial records, subject to acceptance, authority and a clearly defined scope.

365 ALTERAM does not replace aviation authorities, regulators or specialist certification. Technical opinions require the relevant competence and records.

LET’S EXAMINE THE QUESTION

Start with
what needs
a second look.

Tell us the jurisdiction, key date and the aviation investigations question you need examined.

contact@365alteram.com +44 (0)20 4544 6626

Use a brief, neutral summary. Evidence transfer and any confidentiality arrangements are agreed separately.

Truth. Evidence. Justice.
INITIAL ENQUIRY365 ALTERAM / PRIVATE INSTRUCTION

Discuss your matter.

Prepare an email to our team. Your email app opens for you to review and send it.

No files are uploaded. Nothing is submitted by this page.

An enquiry does not create an engagement. Professional assessments are scoped and chargeable. Privacy policy ↗

FICTIONAL CASE STUDIES

Independent review in practice

Invented educational scenarios, not actual client matters or promised results.

Explore all ten cases →