25 / Biometric examination

A proposed identity. The basis for comparison examined.

Independent review of biometric identification evidence, including fingerprint, facial and speaker-comparison claims, with appropriate specialist assessment.

Independent reviewSpecialist coordinationEvidence integrity
WHO WE SUPPORT

Defence counsel, accused persons & authorised representatives

WHAT WE EXAMINE

Fingerprints, facial comparison, speaker comparison & identification claims

WHAT YOU RECEIVE

Biometric source-quality and identification-strength review

THE INVESTIGATIVE SCOPE

Examine the method. Test the evidential consequence.

365 ALTERAM scopes independent biometric examination review for serious and complex criminal matters. Organise source images, recordings, comparison material, method descriptions and available validation information. Scope distinct specialist examinations for the relevant biometric modality rather than treating all identification techniques as one expertise. We define the question, available material and required specialist competence before proposing the work.

01

Does the comparison justify the stated identification strength?

Examine source quality, recording conditions, reference suitability, analyst decisions and any algorithmic scores. Separate a candidate returned by a search system from an independently supported forensic identification.

02

What would an independent examination add?

Organise source images, recordings, comparison material, method descriptions and available validation information. Scope distinct specialist examinations for the relevant biometric modality rather than treating all identification techniques as one expertise.

03

Where could this change a high-stakes case?

A disputed identity can determine whether a person faces a very long or life sentence. 365 ALTERAM can make a material difference by testing the actual comparison conditions and connecting specialist findings to the broader attribution evidence.

04

Which limits must remain explicit?

Biometric methods have modality-specific limitations. A similarity score is not a probability of guilt, and enhanced imagery cannot reliably restore detail that was never captured.

THE PURPOSE

When decades of liberty are at stake, every decisive forensic inference deserves independent scrutiny.

WHEN LIBERTY IS AT STAKE

Where 365 ALTERAM
can make the difference.

A disputed identity can determine whether a person faces a very long or life sentence. 365 ALTERAM can make a material difference by testing the actual comparison conditions and connecting specialist findings to the broader attribution evidence.

For allegations carrying very long or life imprisonment, our role is to connect this discipline to the precise disputed act, identify what can be tested and provide counsel with a clear route back to the source. We preserve findings that support, weaken or leave the allegation unresolved.

Explore all forensic disciplines

HOW AN INSTRUCTION BEGINS

The BALANCE-7 approach
01 / DEFINE

The question
comes first.

We clarify the material issue, available records, authority and jurisdictions before proposing the work.

02 / EXAMINE

Evidence meets
independent scrutiny.

The agreed workstreams connect sources, test reasoning and identify what remains unresolved.

03 / REPORT

Findings return
to their sources.

Counsel receives a scoped record of the analysis, supporting exhibits and material limitations.

BEFORE YOU INSTRUCT

Clear questions.
Straight answers.

Does 365 ALTERAM carry out every test in its own laboratory?+

No such claim is made. 365 ALTERAM scopes, coordinates and integrates independent forensic review. Medical examinations, laboratory testing and reserved expert opinions are assigned to appropriately qualified practitioners or laboratories under an agreed instruction. Availability, authority and any relevant accreditation scope are checked for the actual work.

What will counsel be able to do with the findings?+

The agreed report identifies the source for each material finding, separates facts from inference and records the specialist’s methods and limitations. Counsel can use it to formulate expert questions, seek further material or consider a properly supported challenge. Legal use and admissibility are assessed in the relevant jurisdiction.

Can the review confirm an existing conclusion?+

Yes. Independence means reporting supportive, adverse and inconclusive findings consistently. We examine the record rather than promising a defence-favourable answer. Qualified counsel directs legal strategy and the court determines the use and weight of the evidence.

How does an instruction begin?+

Start with a neutral summary, relevant jurisdictions, procedural dates and the disputed forensic question. Do not send sensitive records through an initial enquiry. Scope, fees, lawful access, confidentiality and evidence-transfer arrangements are agreed before substantive work.

No acquittal, sentence reduction, recovery or specific expert finding is guaranteed. Work is subject to lawful authority, specialist availability, competence and the material preserved. Original sources, handling history, analytical assumptions and limitations remain traceable.

LET’S EXAMINE THE QUESTION

Start with
what needs
a second look.

Tell us the jurisdiction, key date and the biometric examination question you need examined.

contact@365alteram.com +44 (0)20 4544 6626

Use a brief, neutral summary. Evidence transfer and any confidentiality arrangements are agreed separately.

Truth. Evidence. Justice.
INITIAL ENQUIRY365 ALTERAM / PRIVATE INSTRUCTION

Discuss your matter.

Prepare an email to our team. Your email app opens for you to review and send it.

No files are uploaded. Nothing is submitted by this page.

An enquiry does not create an engagement. Professional assessments are scoped and chargeable. Privacy policy ↗

FICTIONAL CASE STUDIES

Independent review in practice

Invented educational scenarios, not actual client matters or promised results.

Explore all ten cases →