Which record belongs to which identifier?
Map supplied subscriber, SIM, device and account identifiers. Make the basis for user attribution explicit.
02 / Telecommunications
A connection in the data. A question in the case.
Independent scrutiny of mobile, subscriber, call-detail and network evidence. We examine how a technical record became a claim about identity, contact, location or conduct.
Call-detail recordsAttributionLocation inferences
WHO WE SUPPORT
Defence teams facing material telecom evidence
WHAT WE EXAMINE
Users, devices, networks & time
WHAT YOU RECEIVE
Source-linked technical review
THE INVESTIGATIVE SCOPE
Precision in a timestamp. Discipline in the interpretation.
The decisive issue often sits between the original provider record and the account presented in the case. We examine that analytical path, with specialist review matched to the available material.
Have events been placed on a consistent clock?
Examine time zones, timestamp definitions, export transformations and gaps across the records provided.
What supports the stated location inference?
Review the underlying network material and the assumptions used to interpret it, with appropriate technical expertise.
Can another reviewer reproduce the conclusion?
Compare original disclosures, analytical tables and reported findings. Record every material transformation and limitation.
THE PURPOSE
Make the inference as visible as the record.
HOW AN INSTRUCTION BEGINS
The BALANCE-7 approachThe question
comes first.
We clarify the material issue, available records, authority and jurisdictions before proposing the work.
Evidence meets
independent scrutiny.
The agreed workstreams connect sources, test reasoning and identify what remains unresolved.
Findings return
to their sources.
Counsel receives a scoped record of the analysis, supporting exhibits and material limitations.
BEFORE YOU INSTRUCT
Clear questions.
Straight answers.
Can you review an existing police or expert analysis?+
Yes. A scoped review can compare supplied source records with the analytical method, derived tables and conclusions in an existing report.
Do you obtain private network data directly?+
Work begins with lawfully available or authorised material. Any further acquisition must follow the applicable legal process and agreed authority.
Will the review establish where someone was?+
That depends on the records and the method. We define what can be supported, what remains uncertain and what additional evidence would be needed.
Technical opinions are limited to the available records, the competence of the instructed specialists and the agreed scope.
LET’S EXAMINE THE QUESTION
Start with
what needs
a second look.
Tell us the jurisdiction, key date and the telecommunications question you need examined.
contact@365alteram.com +44 (0)20 4544 6626Use a brief, neutral summary. Evidence transfer and any confidentiality arrangements are agreed separately.
Truth. Evidence. Justice.FICTIONAL CASE STUDIES
Independent review in practice
Invented educational scenarios, not actual client matters or promised results.
Explore all ten cases →