Which act is attributed to which person?
Map the alleged conduct against dated decisions, communications, responsibilities and available corroboration.
06 / White-collar crime
A corporate connection. An individual question.
Independent factual review in fraud, corruption, money-laundering and other corporate crime matters. Examine the evidence for each person’s decisions, knowledge, authority and alleged benefit.
Individual roleGovernanceAlleged benefit
WHO WE SUPPORT
Defence teams in complex corporate crime matters
WHAT WE EXAMINE
Decisions, knowledge, authority & benefit
WHAT YOU RECEIVE
Individual-role and evidential-gap analysis
THE INVESTIGATIVE SCOPE
Map the organisation. Test the individual allegation.
Extensive corporate records can obscure the particular act alleged against one person. We build a factual account of who decided, who knew, who could act and what the documents actually record.
What was known at the time?
Reconstruct the information available at material decision points and separate contemporaneous records from later interpretation.
Who could authorise or control the transaction?
Compare formal authority with the supplied operational record. Identify differences between title, access and demonstrated action.
How is the alleged benefit supported?
Trace relevant payments, assets or advantages and test the links proposed in the existing analysis.
THE PURPOSE
Make the evidence about the person as clear as the structure around them.
HOW AN INSTRUCTION BEGINS
The BALANCE-7 approachThe question
comes first.
We clarify the material issue, available records, authority and jurisdictions before proposing the work.
Evidence meets
independent scrutiny.
The agreed workstreams connect sources, test reasoning and identify what remains unresolved.
Findings return
to their sources.
Counsel receives a scoped record of the analysis, supporting exhibits and material limitations.
BEFORE YOU INSTRUCT
Clear questions.
Straight answers.
Which allegations can be reviewed?+
A scoped review can address the factual record in alleged fraud, bribery, corruption, money laundering, false accounting and related corporate matters, with specialist input as required.
Do you decide whether conduct meets a legal offence?+
No. We examine the factual and technical record. The legal elements, advice and representation remain with qualified counsel.
Can an existing internal investigation be examined?+
Yes, subject to authority and access. We can assess the supplied record, analytical choices, omissions and the support for material findings.
Investigative work is tailored to the allegation and the available records. Legal conclusions and reserved professional services remain with appropriately qualified advisers.
LET’S EXAMINE THE QUESTION
Start with
what needs
a second look.
Tell us the jurisdiction, key date and the white-collar crime question you need examined.
contact@365alteram.com +44 (0)20 4544 6626Use a brief, neutral summary. Evidence transfer and any confidentiality arrangements are agreed separately.
Truth. Evidence. Justice.FICTIONAL CASE STUDIES
Independent review in practice
Invented educational scenarios, not actual client matters or promised results.
Explore all ten cases →